From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dawson v. State

Supreme Court of Indiana
Mar 29, 2011
943 N.E.2d 1281 (Ind. 2011)

Summary

dismissing defendant's belated appeal and finding that Post-Conviction Rule 2 is available for direct appeals of convictions and sentences but not for belated appeals from an order revoking probation

Summary of this case from Core v. State

Opinion

No. 49S02-1103-CR-176.

March 29, 2011.

Appeal from the Marion Superior Court, No. 49G02-0804-FB-087393; The Honorable Robert R. Altice, Jr., Judge.

On Petition To Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 49A02-1001-CR-155.

Victoria L. Bailey, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant.

Gregory F. Zoeller, Attorney General of Indiana, Ann L. Goodwin, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.


The trial court's final, appealable order revoking Dawson's probation and ordering him to serve six years in the Department of Correction was entered in April 2009. Some eight months later, the trial court granted Dawson permission to file a belated notice of appeal pursuant to Post-Conviction Rule 2.

The rule allows belated appeals in certain criminal cases. A threshold question in this appeal is whether Post-Conviction Rule 2 allows belated appeals from an order revoking probation. The Court of Appeals held that the rule did not apply and declined to consider Dawson's appeal on the merits. Dawson v. State, 938 N.E.2d 841, 844-46 (Ind.Ct.App. 2010).

As relevant to this case, Post-Conviction Rule 2 provides:

Eligible defendant defined. An "eligible defendant" for purposes of this Rule is a defendant who, but lor the defendant's failure to do so timely, would have the right to challenge on direct appeal a conviction or sentence after a trial or plea of guilty by filing a notice of appeal, filing a motion to correct error, or pursuing an appeal.

. . . .

Section 1. Belated Notice of Appeal

(a) Required Showings. An eligible defendant convicted after a trial or plea of guilty may petition the trial court for permission to file a belated notice of appeal of the conviction or sentence if:

(1) the defendant failed to file a timely notice of appeal;

(2) the failure to file a timely notice of appeal was not due to the fault of the defendant; and

(3) the defendant has been diligent in requesting permission to file a belated notice of appeal under this rule.

The Court of Appeals correctly decided that belated appeals from orders revoking probation are not presently available pursuant to Post-Conviction Rule 2. We agree with the Court of Appeals' analysis that the sanction imposed when probation is revoked does not qualify as a "sentence" under the Rule, and therefore Dawson is not an "eligible defendant." Accordingly, we grant transfer and adopt and incorporate by reference the opinion of the Court of Appeals under Appellate Rule 58(A)(1).

SHEPARD, C.J., and DICKSON, SULLIVAN, RUCKER and DAVID, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dawson v. State

Supreme Court of Indiana
Mar 29, 2011
943 N.E.2d 1281 (Ind. 2011)

dismissing defendant's belated appeal and finding that Post-Conviction Rule 2 is available for direct appeals of convictions and sentences but not for belated appeals from an order revoking probation

Summary of this case from Core v. State

dismissing defendant's belated appeal and finding that Post-Conviction Rule 2 is available for direct appeals of convictions and sentences but not for belated appeals from an order revoking probation

Summary of this case from Hampton v. State
Case details for

Dawson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Edward DAWSON, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee…

Court:Supreme Court of Indiana

Date published: Mar 29, 2011

Citations

943 N.E.2d 1281 (Ind. 2011)

Citing Cases

Warren v. State

We must agree. “The plain definition encompasses those who possessed the right but failed to file a timely…

Kincheloe v. State

The sanction imposed when probation is revoked does not qualify as a “sentence” under Post–Conviction Rule 2.…