Opinion
No. 76-337, 76-356.
December 6, 1976, OCTOBER TERM, 1976.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 537 F. 2d 341.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Davis v. United States
U.S.
Dec 6, 1976
429 U.S. 1000 (1976)
Summaries of
Davis v. United States
U.S.
Dec 6, 1976
429 U.S. 1000 (1976)
holding that the TTPI is an agency
Summary of this case from Payne v. U.S.interpreting the federal wire interception and interception of oral communications provisions of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq., on which our telephonic communications act is patterned
Summary of this case from State v. Nashinterpreting the federal wire interception and interception of oral communications provisions of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq., on which our telephonic communications act is patterned
Summary of this case from State v. BrennenCase details for
Davis v. United States
Case Details
Full title:DAVIS v. UNITED STATES; and CHARNAY v. UNITED STATES
Court:U.S.
Date published: Dec 6, 1976
Citations
429 U.S. 1000 (1976)
Citing Cases
United States v. Phillips
We affirm. Phillips' conviction was previously before this court in his direct appeal, United States v.…
United States v. FeraMerely affording the defendant the opportunity for commission of the offense does not constitute entrapment.…