From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 15, 1961
350 S.W.2d 934 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961)

Opinion

No. 33867.

November 15, 1961.

Appeal from the County Court, Upshur County, Welby K. Parish, J.

Florence, Garrison Holt, by Lowell C. Holt, Gilmer, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


The offense is unlawful possession of wine in a dry area for the purpose of sale; the punishment assessed by the jury, 90 days in jail and a fine of $250.

The complaint, regular on its face, purports to be signed by C. D. Matthews and sworn to before the County Attorney who presented the information.

Upon the trial, C. D. Matthews testified that he signed the complaint in the County Attorney's office, but did not swear to it.

Such evidence not being controverted, appellant moved to quash the complaint and information.

Art. 415, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P. provides that no information shall be presented until affidavit has been made by some credible person charging the defendant with an offense.

In the absence of a written complaint duly verified, the prosecution cannot be maintained. Thomas v. State, 107 Tex.Crim. 405, 296 S.W. 310.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.


Summaries of

Davis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 15, 1961
350 S.W.2d 934 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961)
Case details for

Davis v. State

Case Details

Full title:Cleopha DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Nov 15, 1961

Citations

350 S.W.2d 934 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961)
171 Tex. Crim. 400

Citing Cases

Wheat v. State

Appellant acknowledges that the complaint is regular on its face, but contends the evidence at the hearing on…

Smith v. State

Under the record, the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial on the ground urged.        The…