From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Comed, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Jun 24, 1980
623 F.2d 28 (6th Cir. 1980)

Opinion

Nos. 77-3216, 77-3217.

June 24, 1980.

Michael S. Duty, Daniel M. Bennie, Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiffs-cross appellants.

F. Bruce Abel, Steer, Strauss, White Tobias, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendants-cross appellees.

Before WEICK, LIVELY and KEITH, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Upon consideration, it is ordered that the Motion for Clarification of Opinion or in the Alternative, Petition for Rehearing by Defendant-Cross-Appellees Comed, Inc., Mediworld, Inc. and Community Medical Systems Corporation, be and it is hereby denied, 619 F.2d 588 (6th Cir.).

No active judge having requested that a vote be taken on the suggestion of the Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants, Norman H. Davis, et al., that its petition for rehearing be heard en banc, said petition was referred to the panel for determination by the Chief Judge.

Upon consideration, it is ORDERED that said petition for rehearing be and it is hereby denied.


Summaries of

Davis v. Comed, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Jun 24, 1980
623 F.2d 28 (6th Cir. 1980)
Case details for

Davis v. Comed, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NORMAN H. DAVIS ET AL., FOR THEMSELVES AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Jun 24, 1980

Citations

623 F.2d 28 (6th Cir. 1980)

Citing Cases

Larson v. Dumke

[T]he term "economic antagonism" also refers to conflicts between representative and class. Davis v. Comed,…

Jenkins v. Haworth, Inc.

Once Plaintiff was no longer a shareholder of Haworth/New England, due to the applicability of the mandatory…