From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dave's Alum. Siding v. C M Ventures

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 9, 1991
582 So. 2d 147 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Summary

holding dismissal of complaint without prejudice for counsel's failure to appear at case management conference was too severe a sanction where record lacked evidence that failure to appear was willful or flagrant disregard for court's authority

Summary of this case from Martinez v. Collier Cty. Pub. Schools

Opinion

No. 90-2694.

July 9, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Monroe County, J. Jefferson Overby, J.

David M. Shenkman, Coral Gables, for appellant.

David L. Manz, Marathon, for appellee.

Before LEVY, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.


The plaintiff, Dave's Aluminum Siding, Inc., appeals from a final order dismissing its complaint against C. M. Ventures, Inc. We reverse.

The trial court scheduled a case management conference ordering the parties to appear in court on October 17, 1990. The parties prepared and filed a written statement in compliance with the case management conference. The plaintiff contends that he had advised the trial judge's secretary the day before the conference of his inability to be at the hearing due to a scheduling conflict and requested a telephone conference. The trial judge would not allow the plaintiff's counsel to appear by telephone, despite the fact that the defendant had no objection to the plaintiff appearing by telephone. The trial court dismissed the plaintiff's complaint without prejudice due to the plaintiff's counsel failure to appear at the conference. The plaintiff appeals.

After the very professional presentation made by the attorneys on both sides and our careful review of the record, we find that the trial court abused its discretion by dismissing the plaintiff's complaint. That action was too severe a sanction where the record is devoid of evidence showing that the failure of counsel to appear at the case management conference was a willful or flagrant disregard for the court's authority. See United States Fidelity Guar. Co. v. Herr, 539 So.2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Bullock v. Metropolitan Dade County, 438 So.2d 151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Catogas v. Sapp, 397 So.2d 1182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Aller v. Editorial Planeta, S.A., 389 So.2d 321 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Therefore, the order dismissing the plaintiff's complaint without prejudice is reversed.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Dave's Alum. Siding v. C M Ventures

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 9, 1991
582 So. 2d 147 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

holding dismissal of complaint without prejudice for counsel's failure to appear at case management conference was too severe a sanction where record lacked evidence that failure to appear was willful or flagrant disregard for court's authority

Summary of this case from Martinez v. Collier Cty. Pub. Schools
Case details for

Dave's Alum. Siding v. C M Ventures

Case Details

Full title:DAVE'S ALUMINUM SIDING, INC., APPELLANT, v. C M VENTURES, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 9, 1991

Citations

582 So. 2d 147 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Molphus v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

Because the court's order in Clark did not contain an express finding of any flagrant, persistent, willful,…

Martinez v. Collier Cty. Pub. Schools

JCC's dismissal without prejudice was too severe a sanction to impose upon Appellant, even if "good cause"…