From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davenport v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jul 24, 2007
Civ. Action No. 07cv56 (RJL) (D.D.C. Jul. 24, 2007)

Summary

granting as conceded defendant's motion to dismiss where plaintiff failed to file an opposition

Summary of this case from Institute for Policy Studies v. U.S. C.I.A

Opinion

Civ. Action No. 07cv56 (RJL).

July 24, 2007


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Plaintiffs, Stacy and Sharon Davenport have sued the United States challenging the collection activities of the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"). Currently before the Court is defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS defendants' motion to dismiss.

ANALYSIS

Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7(b) provides that an opposing party has 11 days to file a memorandum in opposition to a motion and if such party fails to do so, the court may treat the motion as conceded. LCvR. 7(b). This rule is a "docket-management tool that facilitates efficient and effective resolution of motions by requiring the prompt joining of issues." Fox v. American Airlines, Inc., 389 F.3d 1291, 1294 (D.C. Cir. 2004). In Fox, the D.C. Circuit affirmed the District Court's holding that "because the plaintiffs failed to respond to the defendant's . . . motion, the court treats the motion as conceded and grants the motion." Id. (citations omitted). Whether to treat the motion as conceded under Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7(b) is highly discretionary; and our Circuit Court has noted that "where the district court relies on the absence of a response as a basis for treating the motion as conceded, [the D.C. Circuit will] honor its enforcement of the rule." Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia, 117 F.3d 571, 577 (D.C. Cir. 1997).

In light of the fact that plaintiff failed to file an opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss, even when the Court issued an Order requiring the plaintiff to do so or face the consequences of it being treated as conceded, (See Dkt. 9), the Court will treat defendants' motion as conceded. LCvR 7(b). Therefore, in light of the plaintiff's concession and based on a review of the pleadings, the relevant law cited therein, and the record, the Court finds in favor of the defendants and GRANTS defendants' motion to dismiss. An appropriate Order will issue with this Memorandum Opinion.


Summaries of

Davenport v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jul 24, 2007
Civ. Action No. 07cv56 (RJL) (D.D.C. Jul. 24, 2007)

granting as conceded defendant's motion to dismiss where plaintiff failed to file an opposition

Summary of this case from Institute for Policy Studies v. U.S. C.I.A

granting as conceded defendant's motion to dismiss where plaintiff failed to file an opposition

Summary of this case from Casanova v. Marathon Corp.
Case details for

Davenport v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:STACY DAVENPORT, et al, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Jul 24, 2007

Citations

Civ. Action No. 07cv56 (RJL) (D.D.C. Jul. 24, 2007)

Citing Cases

Institute for Policy Studies v. U.S. C.I.A

This court has treated motions as conceded where, as here, the opposing party failed to demonstrate excusable…

Chan v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n

Chan never responded to this Motion, despite two warnings from this Court to do so. See ECF Nos. 7-8. Thus,…