From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davenport v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Mar 4, 2008
Case No. 3:06CV402 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 4, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 3:06CV402.

March 4, 2008


ORDER


The Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. # 13), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby adopts said Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendations filed on February 15, 2008 (Doc. # 13) is ADOPTED;
2. The Commissioner's non-disability finding is vacated;
3. No finding is made as to whether Plaintiff Owen Brown was under a "disability" within the meaning of the Social Security Act;
4. This case is remanded to the Commissioner and the Administrative Law Judge under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and
5. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court.


Summaries of

Davenport v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Mar 4, 2008
Case No. 3:06CV402 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 4, 2008)
Case details for

Davenport v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK DAVENPORT, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Mar 4, 2008

Citations

Case No. 3:06CV402 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 4, 2008)

Citing Cases

Trimble v. Colvin

The 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527(d)(2) factors discussed above also guide the ALJ in determining how much weight to…

Rowland v. Colvin

The 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527(d)(2) factors discussed above also guide the ALJ in determining how much weight to…