From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Darrell N. W. v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH
Aug 18, 2015
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:02-CR-31-TBR (W.D. Ky. Aug. 18, 2015)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:02-CR-31-TBR

08-18-2015

DARRELL N. WEST MOVANT/DEFENDANT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF

cc: Movant/Defendant West, pro se United States Attorney Clerk, Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Movant/Defendant Darrell N. West's pro se motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244 for authorization to file a second or successive motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (DN 288).

In his motion, West acknowledges that he has already filed a § 2255 motion and that he now seeks to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. West correctly notes that prior to filing a second or successive § 2255 motion in this Court, he must have permission to do so from the Sixth Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A) ("Before a second or successive application . . . is filed in the district court, the applicant shall move in the appropriate court of appeals for an order authorizing the district court to consider the application."); 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h) ("A second or successive motion must be certified as provided in section 2244 by a panel of the appropriate court of appeals. . . ."); see also In re Hanserd, 123 F.3d 922, 934 (6th Cir. 1997) (explaining that "[i]nmates who wish to file a second or successive motion to vacate sentence should first file a motion in [the Sixth Circuit] requesting permission under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244, 2255").

It appears that West has filed his § 2244 motion seeking authorization in this Court rather than the Sixth Circuit. Thus, he has failed to obtain the requisite authorization from the appropriate court of appeals prior to filing the instant motion in the district court. "[W]hen a prisoner has sought § 2244(b)(3) permission from the district court, or when a second or successive petition for habeas corpus relief or § 2255 motion is filed in the district court without § 2244(b)(3) authorization from [the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals], the district court shall transfer the document to [the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals] pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631." In re Sims, 111 F.3d 45, 47 (6th Cir. 1997). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that West's § 2244 motion seeking authorization to file a second or successive § 2255 motion and the attached exhibits (DN 288) are TRANSFERRED to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. Date: August 18, 2015

/s/

Thomas B. Russell, Senior Judge

United States District Court
cc: Movant/Defendant West, pro se

United States Attorney

Clerk, Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
4413.003


Summaries of

Darrell N. W. v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH
Aug 18, 2015
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:02-CR-31-TBR (W.D. Ky. Aug. 18, 2015)
Case details for

Darrell N. W. v. United States

Case Details

Full title:DARRELL N. WEST MOVANT/DEFENDANT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH

Date published: Aug 18, 2015

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:02-CR-31-TBR (W.D. Ky. Aug. 18, 2015)