From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Darragh v. Brock

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 19, 1979
366 So. 2d 801 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

No. KK-102.

January 9, 1979. Rehearing Denied February 19, 1979.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Escambia County, William Frye III, J.

John R. Grass, Pensacola, for appellant.

Danny L. Kepner of Shell, Fleming, Davis Menge, Pensacola, for appellee U.S. Fidelity Guaranty Co., Inc.

Donald H. Partington of Clark, Partington, Hart Hart, Pensacola, for appellee Cadwallader Brock.


Appellant claims on this appeal that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to the appellee-insurer. We find no error and affirm.

The action arose out of a physical confrontation between appellant and Brock at his residence during which she allegedly received injuries. She initially sued Brock for intentional tort, but subsequently, upon learning that his homeowner's liability insurance excluded coverage for "bodily injury and property damage which is either expected or intended from the standpoint of the insured," amended her complaint to allege negligence. The insurer argued below and here that Brock's alleged acts could in no way be considered negligence.

Our review of the record supports the insurer's position. Whatever the insured's degree of force might have been, it is clear from the appellant's own deposition that the natural probable, and intended result of his acts was to harm her. On this record, the insurer's liability was precluded as a matter of law. See West Building Materials, Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 363 So.2d 398 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Spreen, 343 So.2d 649 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

Brock in his individual capacity also filed an "appellee's brief" in this cause contesting the summary judgment in favor of his insurer. However, he failed to file a cross-appeal indicating his adversity to the appellee-insurer. We therefore find that his motion requesting appellate attorney's fees against the insurer is precluded. Even if he had proceeded properly, there is not at this point any "judgment or decree . . against an insurer and in favor of an insured" justifying an award of attorney's fees under Section 627.428(1), Florida Statutes (1977).

Accordingly, Brock's motion for attorney's fees is DENIED and the summary judgment in favor of U.S.F. G. is AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, Acting C.J., MELVIN, J., and MASON, ERNEST E., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Darragh v. Brock

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 19, 1979
366 So. 2d 801 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Darragh v. Brock

Case Details

Full title:MARIE DARRAGH, APPELLANT, v. CADWALLADER BROCK AND UNITED STATES FIDELITY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 19, 1979

Citations

366 So. 2d 801 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Citing Cases

Ladas v. Aetna Ins. Co.

Ladas' own allegations thus indicate that the insured's actions fell clearly within the exclusion contained…

Draffen v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Id. at 651. See also Darragh v. Brock, 366 So.2d 801 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). The cases relied on by appellant…