From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Darling v. J.B. Expedited Services, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Cookeville Division
Aug 1, 2006
No. 2:05-0017 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 1, 2006)

Summary

analyzing a motor-carrier's liability under state agency law after noting that the ICC regulations create an irrebuttable presumption of an employment relationship between the carrier and driver

Summary of this case from Bays v. Summitt Trucking, LLC

Opinion

No. 2:05-0017.

August 1, 2006


ORDER


In accordance with the Memorandum filed herewith, the Defendant J.B. Expedited Inc.'s motions for summary judgment, (Docket Entry Nos. 37 and 55) are GRANTED in part, to dismiss the Plaintiff's joint enterprise claim against this defendant, but is otherwise DENIED. The Defendant Kusnierz's motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 34) is DENIED. The Defendant C M Transport's motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 38) is DENIED. The Defendants' motion for hearing (Docket Entry No. 40) is DENIED. The Defendant Kusnierz's motion to strike affidavits (Docket Entry No. 51) is DENIED. The Plaintiff's motion for sanctions (Docket Entry No. 57) is DENIED. in part, to grant a jury instruction on spoliation of evidence, but is otherwise DENIED. Plaintiff's motion for Order of reference for ADR proceedings (Docket Entry No. 68) is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Darling v. J.B. Expedited Services, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Cookeville Division
Aug 1, 2006
No. 2:05-0017 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 1, 2006)

analyzing a motor-carrier's liability under state agency law after noting that the ICC regulations create an irrebuttable presumption of an employment relationship between the carrier and driver

Summary of this case from Bays v. Summitt Trucking, LLC
Case details for

Darling v. J.B. Expedited Services, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RENITA DARLING Plaintiff, v. J.B. EXPEDITED SERVICES, INC. C M Transport…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Cookeville Division

Date published: Aug 1, 2006

Citations

No. 2:05-0017 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 1, 2006)

Citing Cases

Steinberg v. Luedtke Trucking, Inc.

In response, Plaintiff asserts that pedestrians who are struck by commercial trucks are within the class of…

Schnelting v. Clair R-XIII SCH

Rule 703 does not require experts to possess the type of personal knowledge that lay witnesses must. See…