From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Darden-Munsell v. Dutch Maid Logistics

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 2, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-103 Erie (W.D. Pa. Aug. 2, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-103 Erie.

August 2, 2011


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This action was received by the Clerk of Court on April 22, 2010 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 49], filed on July 13, 2011, recommended that Defendants' partial motion to dismiss [ECF No. 21] be denied. The parties were allowed fourteen (14) days from the date of service to file objections and no objections were filed. After de novo review of the documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 2nd day of August, 2011;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' partial motion to dismiss [ECF No. 21] is DENIED.

The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 49] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on July 13, 2011, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Darden-Munsell v. Dutch Maid Logistics

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 2, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-103 Erie (W.D. Pa. Aug. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Darden-Munsell v. Dutch Maid Logistics

Case Details

Full title:DEBRA DARDEN-MUNSELL, Plaintiff, v. DUTCH MAID LOGISTICS, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 2, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-103 Erie (W.D. Pa. Aug. 2, 2011)

Citing Cases

Kunsman v. Metro. Direct Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.

In a Rule 12(f) motion, the court must view the pleadings in the light most favorable to the non-moving…