From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DANT v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

U.S.
Jan 1, 1875
91 U.S. 557 (1875)

Opinion

OCTOBER TERM, 1875.

Mr. Reginald Fendall for the plaintiff in error; and Mr. E.L. Stanton, contra.


ERROR to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.


This is an action to recover damages sustained by the plaintiff on the 14th of November, 1871, in consequence of the unsafe condition and negligent management of the streets of the District of Columbia. The court below ruled that the District was not liable, and directed a verdict for the defendant.

The case is controlled by the principles governing that of Barnes v. District of Columbia, supra, p. 540.

The judgment is reversed, and a new trial ordered.

MR. JUSTICE SWAYNE, MR. JUSTICE FIELD, MR. JUSTICE STRONG, and MR. JUSTICE BRADLEY, dissented.


Summaries of

DANT v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

U.S.
Jan 1, 1875
91 U.S. 557 (1875)
Case details for

DANT v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case Details

Full title:DANT v . DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 1, 1875

Citations

91 U.S. 557 (1875)

Citing Cases

Coughlin v. District of Columbia

But this court on writ of error reversed that judgment and ordered a new trial. Dant v. District of Columbia,…