From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dano Resource Recovery, Inc. v. District of Columbia

U.S.
Oct 18, 1993
510 U.S. 931 (1993)

Summary

holding that where a debtor obtains relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code based on his representations under penalty of perjury that he had no assets other than those scheduled, that debtor is judicially estopped from asserting prepetition claims not disclosed during the bankruptcy case, even though the judicial estoppel might result in a windfall to the defendant

Summary of this case from Amundaray-Rodriguez v. Garcia

Opinion

No. 93-122.

October 18, 1993.


Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 620 A. 2d 1346.


Summaries of

Dano Resource Recovery, Inc. v. District of Columbia

U.S.
Oct 18, 1993
510 U.S. 931 (1993)

holding that where a debtor obtains relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code based on his representations under penalty of perjury that he had no assets other than those scheduled, that debtor is judicially estopped from asserting prepetition claims not disclosed during the bankruptcy case, even though the judicial estoppel might result in a windfall to the defendant

Summary of this case from Amundaray-Rodriguez v. Garcia
Case details for

Dano Resource Recovery, Inc. v. District of Columbia

Case Details

Full title:DANO RESOURCE RECOVERY, INC. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 18, 1993

Citations

510 U.S. 931 (1993)

Citing Cases

United States v. Cooley

As the Washington Supreme Court has noted, "[a]llowing a known drunk driver to get back in his or her car,…

United States v. Cooley

We do not here question the authority of tribal police to patrol roads within a reservation, including…