From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. Tucker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Feb 3, 2012
CASE NO. 5:09-cv-328/RS-EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 3, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:09-cv-328/RS-EMT

02-03-2012

SCOTT A. DANIELS, Petitioner, v. KENNETH S. TUCKER, Respondent.


ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 69). No objections have been filed.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. The Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 11) is DENIED.
3. The certificate of appealability is DENIED because Plaintiff has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a Constitutional right.
4. Petitioner's second Motion to Extend Time for Filing Objections (Doc. 45) is DENIED.
5. The clerk is directed to close the file.

_________________

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Daniels v. Tucker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Feb 3, 2012
CASE NO. 5:09-cv-328/RS-EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Daniels v. Tucker

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT A. DANIELS, Petitioner, v. KENNETH S. TUCKER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION

Date published: Feb 3, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 5:09-cv-328/RS-EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 3, 2012)

Citing Cases

Hopkins v. Lee

II. Pending litigation. Storey v. Rhodes, et al., 178 Miss. 776; Tucker v. Daniels, 50 So.2d 896; 11 Am. Jur.…