From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. Gaither

United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia
Jul 29, 2022
Civil Action 3:22CV526-HEH (E.D. Va. Jul. 29, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:22CV526-HEH

07-29-2022

JOSEPH A. DANIELS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL GAITHER, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

(Dismissing Action Because Plaintiff has Three Strikes)

HENRY E. HUDSON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a Virginia inmate, has submitted this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaining that he contracted COVID-19 in 2020, but has never been treated for his loss of taste and smell. However, Plaintiff may not file an action in this Court in forma pauperis because he is barred by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The pertinent statute provides:

In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action [in forma pauperis] if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff has at least three other actions or appeals that have been dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim. See, e.g, Daniels v. Caldwell, No. 3:14CV856, 2015 WL 7283121, at *2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 16, 2015); Daniels v. Jarratt, No. 3:13CV440, 2014 WL 12654876, at *1 (E.D. Va. July 22, 2014); Daniels v. Caldwell, No. 3:11CV461, 2013 WL 6713129, at *4 (E.D. Va. Dec. 18, 2013). Plaintiff contacted COVID-19 in 2020 and suggests that he has never received medical treatment for loss of taste or smell. (ECF No. 1, at 5-6.) Plaintiffs current submission does not suggest that he is in imminent danger of serious physical harm. Accordingly, any request to proceed in forma pauperis will be DENIED. The action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Plaintiff remains free to submit a new complaint with the full $402 filing fee. The full $402 fee must be filed with any new complaint or the Court will dismiss the action. The Court will process any new complaint as a new civil action.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.


Summaries of

Daniels v. Gaither

United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia
Jul 29, 2022
Civil Action 3:22CV526-HEH (E.D. Va. Jul. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Daniels v. Gaither

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH A. DANIELS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL GAITHER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia

Date published: Jul 29, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 3:22CV526-HEH (E.D. Va. Jul. 29, 2022)