Summary
granting summary judgment on ground that plaintiff failed to demonstrate any issues of material fact regarding whether defendants violated his right against self-incrimination where plaintiff was required to admit guilt as part of a sex offender treatment program or face withholding of good time credits and would be ineligible for parole
Summary of this case from Sayles v. FischerOpinion
Civil Case No. 08-cv-01586-LTB-MEH.
October 6, 2009
ORDER
This case is before me on the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Doc 52), converted to a Motion for Summary judgment (Doc 84) be granted, that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc 89) be denied, and Plaintiff's Motion for T.R.O. and Preliminary Injunction (Doc 37) be denied. The Magistrate Judge therefore recommends that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants be dismissed with prejudice. The Plaintiff has filed timely specific written objections to the Magistrate Judge's recommendations. I have therefore reviewed the recommendations de novo in light of the file and record in this case. On de novo review, I conclude that the recommendations are correct. Accordingly
ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Doc 52), converted to a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc 84) is GRANTED;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc 89) is DENIED;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for T.R.O. and Preliminary Injunction (Doc 37) is DENIED;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against the Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the above action is DISMISSED.