From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. City of Albany

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 2, 1964
21 A.D.2d 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Opinion

July 2, 1964


This is an appeal (Action No. 1) from an order of Special Term which granted leave to serve an amended complaint and to increase the ad damnum clause therein. The first cause of action of plaintiff's amended complaint, captioned "Cause of Action in Nuisance" is actually a claim in nuisance growing out of negligence, as evidenced by Paragraph "8" therein and, at most, would only broaden the proof as to what might constitute a continuing act of negligence. Thus, the gravamen of the complaint, in its entirety, is the alleged negligent acts of the defendants which would be the sole basis for any recovery after trial. ( Morello v. Brookfield Constr. Co., 4 N.Y.2d 83, 90, 91.) It hardly seems necessary to observe that we do not consider the merits of the action. Order of Special Term affirmed, with $10 costs. Gibson, P.J., Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Daniels v. City of Albany

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 2, 1964
21 A.D.2d 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)
Case details for

Daniels v. City of Albany

Case Details

Full title:JEAN H. DANIELS as Committee of the Person and Property of GEORGE A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 2, 1964

Citations

21 A.D.2d 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Citing Cases

Rainbow v. Albert Elia Building Co.

The proof to support a verdict under one theory does not differ from the proof required for recovery under…

Frances B. v. Mark B

If the underlying facts relied on are the proper subject for relief, opportunity ought to be afforded the…