From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dandridge v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Jul 8, 1957
247 F.2d 105 (D.C. Cir. 1957)

Opinion

No. 13813.

Argued June 18, 1957.

Decided July 8, 1957. Writ of Certiorari Granted November 12, 1957. See 78 S.Ct. 125.

Mr. Bernard Dunau (appointed by this Court), Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Mr. Alfred Burka, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., Lewis Carroll and Alexander L. Stevas, Asst. U.S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and PRETTYMAN and BURGER, Circuit Judges.


Appellant urges that the District Court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw a plea of guilty to a charge of assault with a deadly weapon contemporaneous with dismissal of a charge of carrying a dangerous weapon.

A hearing was conducted in which the District Judge questioned appellant and his counsel on the circumstances surrounding the making of a plea of guilty before he denied the motion. We find no abuse of discretion.

Affirmed.

EDGERTON, Chief Judge, dissents.


Summaries of

Dandridge v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Jul 8, 1957
247 F.2d 105 (D.C. Cir. 1957)
Case details for

Dandridge v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Clarence B. DANDRIDGE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Jul 8, 1957

Citations

247 F.2d 105 (D.C. Cir. 1957)
101 U.S. App. D.C. 114

Citing Cases

Sullivan v. United States

Memorandum For The United States p. 16, Dusky v. United States, supra. Cf. Dandridge v. United States, 356…

Poole v. United States

See Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(d); Note, 64 Yale L.J. 590 (1955); Comment, 22 U. of Chi.L.Rev. 730 (1955); Note, 55…