From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DAMM v. RUBIN

United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Lafayette Division
Jun 11, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-717, SECTION P (W.D. La. Jun. 11, 2007)

Summary

denying TRO for possible future retaliation

Summary of this case from Adams v. Sers

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-717, SECTION P.

June 11, 2007


ORDER


For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law, and considering the objections to the Report and Recommendation in the record;

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for the issuance of a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction [rec. doc. 7] is DENIED.


Summaries of

DAMM v. RUBIN

United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Lafayette Division
Jun 11, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-717, SECTION P (W.D. La. Jun. 11, 2007)

denying TRO for possible future retaliation

Summary of this case from Adams v. Sers

denying TRO for possible future retaliation

Summary of this case from Irby v. Leblanc
Case details for

DAMM v. RUBIN

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY PAUL DAMM v. JUDGE EDWARD D. RUBIN, ET AL

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Lafayette Division

Date published: Jun 11, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-717, SECTION P (W.D. La. Jun. 11, 2007)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Warden U S P Pollock

A claim of retaliation cannot be prospective or speculative. See Burley v. Davis, 6:17-cv-490, 2018 WL…

Thomas v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

So the evidence of record is that Defendant Cutshall failed to do something, i.e., failed to request a…