From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D'Amico v. D'Amico

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
May 31, 1960
26 Misc. 2d 76 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)

Opinion

May 31, 1960

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, JOHN A. MONTELEONE, J.

Bernstein Bernstein ( Charles E. Bernstein of counsel), for appellant.

Stanley Hendricks for respondent.


Accrued alimony and support payments under a valid Alabama divorce decree are recoverable by action in this State. ( Scott v. Scott, 265 Ala. 208; Epps v. Epps, 218 Ala. 667; Rochelle v. Rochelle, 235 Ala. 526; Sistare v. Sistare, 218 U.S. 1; Smith v. Smith, 255 App. Div. 652; Hafstad v. Hafstad, 20 Misc.2d 979.) Reinstatement of the judgment does not preclude defendant from appealing therefrom on the merits. Eighteen days will be available for that purpose after due service of a copy of the order of reinstatement together with notice of entry. (8 Carmody-Waite, New York Practice, p. 589, § 123; Fox v. Lindenman, 145 N.Y.S. 896.)

The order should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $10 costs to the plaintiff and judgment in favor of plaintiff reinstated.

Concur — HART, DI GIOVANNA and BENJAMIN, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

D'Amico v. D'Amico

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
May 31, 1960
26 Misc. 2d 76 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)
Case details for

D'Amico v. D'Amico

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPHINE D'AMICO, Appellant, v. CHRISTOPHER D'AMICO, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: May 31, 1960

Citations

26 Misc. 2d 76 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)
201 N.Y.S.2d 808