From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daly v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 27, 1998
254 A.D.2d 214 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 27, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.).


The ceiling of the underground steam vault in which plaintiff, a utility company employee, was working at ground level, lubricating a slip joint in order to stop a leak in a steam main, was a completed structure, and its collapse and plaintiff's resultant injury was not due to an elevation-related hazard within the meaning of Labor Law § 240 (1) ( see, Misseritti v. Mark IV Constr. Co., 86 N.Y.2d 487; Fox v. Jenny Eng'g Corp., 122 A.D.2d 532, affd on other grounds 70 N.Y.2d 761; Amato v. State of New York, 241 A.D.2d 400, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 805). In support of his Labor Law § 241 (6) claim, plaintiff cites Industrial Code (12 N.Y.CRR) § 23-1.7 (a), but he fails to present any evidence that the work he was engaged in was "normally exposed to falling material or objects" ( 12 NYCRR 23-1.7 [a] [1], and the claim was therefore properly dismissed ( see, Amato v. State of New York, supra, at 401-402).

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Daly v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 27, 1998
254 A.D.2d 214 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Daly v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM DALY, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent and Third-Party…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 27, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 214 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 128

Citing Cases

Quinlan v. City of New York

Plaintiff alleges that he was injured when a piece of metal inside a wall separating two rooms dislodged and…

Lind v. Tishman Constr. Corp. of N.Y.

Plaintiffs fail to show that this section applies under the circumstances. (See e.g. Daly v City of New York,…