From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daily v. Federal Insurance Co.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Oct 24, 2005
Case No. C 04-3791 PJH (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. C 04-3791 PJH.

October 24, 2005

MORGAN, LEWIS BOCKIUS LLP, DAVID E. WEISS, CRISTINA M. SHEA, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff GREGORY S. DAILY.

H. Paul Breslin Attorneys for Defendant FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY.

WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN DICKER LLP, Louis Castoria Attorneys for Defendant ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY Successor in Interest to Royal Insurance Company of America.


STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL


IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, through their designated counsel, that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice, with respect to all claims for Defense Costs, and for conduct of Defendants Federal Insurance Company ("Federal") and Royal Indemnity Company, as successor in interest to Royal Insurance Company of America ("Royal"), up to and including September 6, 2005, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1);

"Defense Costs" refer to all attorneys fees and costs (including but not limited to expert witness fees, court costs, deposition expenses, copying expenses and other costs reasonably necessary to the defense of Daily in the underlying litigation) with respect to Daily's defense of the underlying litigation that have been or will be incurred through and including resolution of the appeal by Auerbach of the judgment in favor of U.S. Bancorp entered on July 22, 2005.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that with respect to all other claims, including the Counterclaim filed by Federal against Gregory S. Daily ("Daily"), the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, dismissed without prejudice;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that each party will bear its own costs with respect to this action.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Daily v. Federal Insurance Co.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Oct 24, 2005
Case No. C 04-3791 PJH (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2005)
Case details for

Daily v. Federal Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY S. DAILY, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL INSURANCE CO., et al., Defendants…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Oct 24, 2005

Citations

Case No. C 04-3791 PJH (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2005)

Citing Cases

Washington v. Landmark Tech. A

” Perez v. Guardian Roofing, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30302, * 5 (W.D. Wash. 2016) (citing Rayman v. Peoples…

Perez v. Guardian Roofing

In the context of counterclaims for declaratory relief, some courts use their discretion to dismiss "mirror…