From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dailey v. the City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 23, 1916
113 N.E. 1065 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued May 1, 1916

Decided May 23, 1916

Lamar Hardy, Corporation Counsel ( E. Crosby Kindleberger, Terence Farley and John F. Collins of counsel), for appellants.

Nathan L. Miller and Mark Ash for respondents.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, CARDOZO, SEABURY and POUND, JJ.


Summaries of

Dailey v. the City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 23, 1916
113 N.E. 1065 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Dailey v. the City of New York

Case Details

Full title:JOHN D. DAILEY et al., Respondents, v . THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 23, 1916

Citations

113 N.E. 1065 (N.Y. 1916)
113 N.E. 1065

Citing Cases

Atlantic C. Line R. Co. v. U.S. F. Guaranty Co.

In that case, where libelant could have sued both, it was intended that the judgment should adjudicate any…