From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dailey v. Albeck

The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two
Oct 23, 1952
249 P.2d 234 (Wash. 1952)

Opinion

No. 32209.

October 23, 1952.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chelan county, Kemp, J., entered March 26, 1952, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action for personal injuries, tried to the court. Affirmed.

Dailey Conroy, for appellants.

O'Connor O'Connor, for respondents.



Plaintiffs brought this action to recover damages for injuries sustained in a collision between an automobile in which they were riding as guests, and the automobile driven by defendant John J. Albeck.

The trial court found that plaintiffs' injuries were not caused by the negligence of defendant, and entered judgment dismissing the action.

Plaintiffs' appeal challenges this finding, but the evidence does not preponderate against it. Consequently, we will not disturb it.

Plaintiffs also contend that the court erroneously rejected an exhibit which they offered in evidence. The record discloses that this exhibit was admitted in evidence "subject to such consideration as the Court thinks it is entitled to." In his oral decision, the trial judge stated that he did not "give much weight" to the exhibit, but it was not rejected.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Dailey v. Albeck

The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two
Oct 23, 1952
249 P.2d 234 (Wash. 1952)
Case details for

Dailey v. Albeck

Case Details

Full title:WALTER S. DAILEY et al., Appellants, v. JOHN J. ALBECK et al., Respondents

Court:The Supreme Court of Washington. Department Two

Date published: Oct 23, 1952

Citations

249 P.2d 234 (Wash. 1952)
249 P.2d 234
41 Wash. 2d 945

Citing Cases

Guier v. Shaw

The case will therefore be disposed of by a per curiam opinion. See Amick v. Flash (1952), 41 Wn.2d 666, 251…

Doss v. Schuller

We have heretofore indicated that in such a situation, when there is evidence to sustain the findings of fact…