From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DAHL v. LEVENBERG

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1916
172 App. Div. 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

January, 1916.


No final judgment has been entered, but if, in view of the stipulation of the parties, the order may be deemed such, it should be reversed, without costs, and the demurrer sustained, with leave to plead over on payment of costs. There should be united as plaintiffs all the owners of the mortgage, including the personal representatives of any who may have died. If the consent of any one of such persons cannot be obtained he may be made a defendant, "the reason therefor being stated in the complaint." The complaint is also defective on account of the failure to observe the requirement of section 1629 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Carr, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred. Order of the County Court of Kings county reversed, without costs, and demurrer sustained, with leave to plead over on payment of costs.


Summaries of

DAHL v. LEVENBERG

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1916
172 App. Div. 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

DAHL v. LEVENBERG

Case Details

Full title:MINNIE DAHL, Respondent, v . SAMUEL LEVENBERG, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1916

Citations

172 App. Div. 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Citing Cases

Horbal v. St. John's Church

It was proper for plaintiffs to make him party defendant. Caylor v. Cooper, 165 Fed. 757, 762; Dahl v.…

418 Trading Corp. v. Moon Realty Corp.

Despite a belated letter signed by the senior participant consenting to the institution of the foreclosure…