From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daegeke v. Kansas

U.S.
Oct 14, 1963
375 U.S. 1 (1963)

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.

No. 72, Misc.

Decided October 14, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 190 Kan. 613, 376 P.2d 807.

Petitioner pro se.

William M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.


The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Kansas for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.

For reasons expressed in his dissenting opinion in No. 16, Misc., Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, post, p. 3, and related cases, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would set this case for argument of the question whether Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, should be applied retroactively.


Summaries of

Daegeke v. Kansas

U.S.
Oct 14, 1963
375 U.S. 1 (1963)
Case details for

Daegeke v. Kansas

Case Details

Full title:DAEGEKE v . KANSAS

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 14, 1963

Citations

375 U.S. 1 (1963)
84 S. Ct. 89

Citing Cases

Donnell v. Swenson

Mr. Justice Harlan dissented in all three because he felt that the cases should be set for argument of the…

Brown v. United States

This evidence has proved invaluable in fully understanding and evaluating the basis — or lack of basis — for…