From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dack v. Dack

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 15, 1881
84 N.Y. 663 (N.Y. 1881)

Opinion

Argued March 1, 1881

Decided March 15, 1881

Wm. F. Cogswell for appellants.

Q. Van Voorhis for respondent.



FINCH, J., reads for modification of judgment of General Term, by remitting case to surrogate to be heard upon the question of fraud and undue influence as affecting the codicil, and for affirmance as thus modified.

All concur, except RAPALLO, J., absent.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Dack v. Dack

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 15, 1881
84 N.Y. 663 (N.Y. 1881)
Case details for

Dack v. Dack

Case Details

Full title:ELIZA DACK, Respondent, v . JAMES DACK, JR., et al., Appellants

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 15, 1881

Citations

84 N.Y. 663 (N.Y. 1881)

Citing Cases

Matter of Reynolds

Matter of Sizer, 129 A.D. 7, 9; Matter of Kellum, 52 N.Y. 517. Even in the absence of an attestation clause a…

Matter of Purdy

The declaration by the testator to the witnesses that the paper is his will does not dispense with these…