From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D. T. v. Inde. Sch. Dist. No. 16

U.S.
Oct 1, 1990
498 U.S. 879 (1990)

Summary

finding that a teacher who sexually abused a student during a summer vacation did not act under color of law because there was no real nexus between the sexual abuse and the public school

Summary of this case from Hall v. Witteman

Opinion

No. 89-1834.

October 1, 1990, October TERM, 1989.


ORDER

C.A. 10th Cir. Motion of petitioners for leave to file amended petition granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 894 F. 2d 1176.


Summaries of

D. T. v. Inde. Sch. Dist. No. 16

U.S.
Oct 1, 1990
498 U.S. 879 (1990)

finding that a teacher who sexually abused a student during a summer vacation did not act under color of law because there was no real nexus between the sexual abuse and the public school

Summary of this case from Hall v. Witteman

noting that future dangerousness applies to everyone

Summary of this case from State v. McAnulty

concerning admissibility of mitigating evidence in penalty phase

Summary of this case from State v. Williams

illustrating that problem

Summary of this case from Dorn v. Three Rivers Sch. Dist.

applying immediate and serious risk of danger or disruption or escape test without reference to less restrictive alternatives

Summary of this case from State v. Merrell
Case details for

D. T. v. Inde. Sch. Dist. No. 16

Case Details

Full title:D. T., A MINOR, BY HIS LEGALLY APPOINTED GUARDIANS, ET AL. v. INDEPENDENT…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 1, 1990

Citations

498 U.S. 879 (1990)

Citing Cases

State v. Guzek

In 1988, defendant was convicted of two counts of aggravated murder and sentenced to death. On automatic and…

State v. Moore

See State v. Smith, 310 Or. 1, 29, 791 P.2d 836 (1990) ("We consistently have held that ORS 163.150 (1) * * *…