Opinion
04-11-2023
D. S. v. D. S.
Charles D. Ray and Justyn P. Stokely, in support of the petition. Kenneth J. Bartschi and Karen L. Dowd, in opposition.
Charles D. Ray and Justyn P. Stokely, in support of the petition.
Kenneth J. Bartschi and Karen L. Dowd, in opposition.
The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 217 Conn. App. 530, 289 A.3d 236 (2023), is granted, limited to the following issues:
"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the defendant's interest in her law firm's retirement plan was too uncertain to qualify as marital property subject to equitable distribution pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-81 ?
"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had not abused its discretion in awarding alimony that (1) was terminable at the defendant's sole discretion, and (2) was specific to the defendant's employment at one particular firm?"