From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cyrus v. Henes

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 9, 1994
70 Ohio St. 3d 640 (Ohio 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-2066

Submitted October 12, 1994 —

Decided November 9, 1994.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lorain County, No. 92CA005527.

Nurenberg, Plevin, Heller McCarthy Co., L.P.A., Thomas Mester, Joel Levin, James T. Schumacher and Sandra J. Rosenthal, for appellant.

Ogne, Alberts Stuart, P.C., Wayne L. Ogne, Bryan Cermak and Michael A. Ross, for appellees.


The judgment of the court of appeals, 89 Ohio App.3d 172, 623 N.E.2d 1256, is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court on the authority of Brennaman v. R.M.I. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 460, 639 N.E.2d 425.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.


for the reasons stated in the Chief Justice's opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part in Brennaman v. R.M.I. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 460, 639 N.E.2d 425.


Summaries of

Cyrus v. Henes

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 9, 1994
70 Ohio St. 3d 640 (Ohio 1994)
Case details for

Cyrus v. Henes

Case Details

Full title:CYRUS, APPELLANT, v. HENES; WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION ET AL.…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Nov 9, 1994

Citations

70 Ohio St. 3d 640 (Ohio 1994)
640 N.E.2d 810

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. A. of Trial Law. v. Sheward

d 360, 653 N.E.2d 212 (two-year statute of limitations contained in R.C. 2744.04[A], enacted in 1985 as part…

Wojcik v. Pratt

But, in the absence of such factual issues, the application of the limitation is a question of law." Cyrus v.…