From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cutillo v. Cinelli

U.S.
May 2, 1988
485 U.S. 1037 (1988)

Summary

finding that a violation of section 1983 was established when a criminal defendant was wrongfully denied presence of counsel during interrogation and, that this deprivation led to prejudice

Summary of this case from Jackson v. Faber

Opinion

No. 87-725.

May 2, 1988.


C.A. 1st Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 820 F. 2d 474.


Summaries of

Cutillo v. Cinelli

U.S.
May 2, 1988
485 U.S. 1037 (1988)

finding that a violation of section 1983 was established when a criminal defendant was wrongfully denied presence of counsel during interrogation and, that this deprivation led to prejudice

Summary of this case from Jackson v. Faber

noting circuit split on who bears the burden to prove prejudice

Summary of this case from United States v. Orduno-Ramirez

interpreting sections 27, 29

Summary of this case from Vazquez v. Metropolitan Dade County

noting conflicting approaches within the Circuits in cases where the Sixth Amendment violation involves the transmission of confidential defense strategy information

Summary of this case from United States v. Carter
Case details for

Cutillo v. Cinelli

Case Details

Full title:CUTILLO ET AL. v. CINELLI

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 2, 1988

Citations

485 U.S. 1037 (1988)

Citing Cases

State v. Lenarz

I disagree with the majority's enumeration of the three categories because, in fact, the second group of…

Vazquez v. Metropolitan Dade County

Thus, sections 27 and 29 of the Restatement (Second) indicate that prior litigation of an issue does not give…