From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curtis v. Square-D Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Aug 16, 1995
73 Ohio St. 3d 79 (Ohio 1995)

Opinion

No. 95-185

Submitted July 12, 1995 —

Decided August 16, 1995.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Williams County, No. 94WM000003.

Manahan, Pietrykowski, Bamman DeLaney and George C. Ward, for appellant.


The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the judgment of the trial court is reinstated on the authority of McAuliffe v. W. States Import Co., Inc. (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 534, 651 N.E.2d 957.

MOYER, C.J., WRIGHT, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.

DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent.


I respectfully dissent. I do so on the basis of Justice Francis E. Sweeney's well-reasoned dissent in McAuliffe v. W. States Import Co., Inc. (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 534, 651 N.E.2d 957. Given the majority opinion in McAuliffe, it should now be understood that all common-law products liability causes of action survive the enactment of R.C. 2307.71 et seq., the Ohio Product Liability Act, unless specifically covered by the Act because the Act, according to the majority in McAuliffe, "* * * falls short of creating a previously unavailable cause of action * * *." Id. at 538, 651 N.E.2d aT 960. The courts of appeals were right in both this case and McAuliffe.

RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.


Summaries of

Curtis v. Square-D Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Aug 16, 1995
73 Ohio St. 3d 79 (Ohio 1995)
Case details for

Curtis v. Square-D Co.

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS, APPELLEE, v. SQUARE-D COMPANY; OWENS MONTPELIER ELECTRIC, INC.…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Aug 16, 1995

Citations

73 Ohio St. 3d 79 (Ohio 1995)
652 N.E.2d 664

Citing Cases

Sutowski v. Eli Lilly & Co.

In contrast, the Carrel court held that "`all common-law products liability causes of action survive the…

White v. DePuy, Inc.

Carrel at 289, quoting Byers v. Consol. Aluminum Corp. (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 51, 52 (Douglas, J.,…