From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curry v. Wainwright

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 22, 1982
419 So. 2d 744 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 82-834.

September 22, 1982.

Petition from the Florida Parole and Probation Commission.

Warren T. Curry, pro se.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and C. Michael Barnette, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for respondent.


The first district, not this district, is the proper venue for a petition for mandamus seeking to require the Florida Parole and Probation Commission to give credit for time served in computing petitioner's presumptive parole release date. Taylor v. Wainwright, 418 So.2d 1095 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Lyden v. Wainwright, 307 So.2d 258 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). Since the petition does not contain definite allegations that if the presumptive parole release date were properly computed, petitioner would be entitled to immediate release, this court cannot treat the petition as one for habeas corpus, as was done in Taylor and Lyden.

Accordingly, the cause is hereby transferred back to the First District Court of Appeal.

DAUKSCH and SHARP, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Curry v. Wainwright

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 22, 1982
419 So. 2d 744 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Curry v. Wainwright

Case Details

Full title:WARREN T. CURRY, PETITIONER, v. LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, ETC., RESPONDENT

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Sep 22, 1982

Citations

419 So. 2d 744 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Stovall v. Cooper

The First, Third, Fourth, and Fifth Districts have stated that venue for a mandamus proceeding seeking an…

O'Berry v. Fla. Parole Prob. Comm

PER CURIAM. This petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging petitioner's presumptive parole release date…