From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curry v. Thomas

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 8, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-94J (W.D. Pa. Sep. 8, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-94J.

September 8, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


The above captioned case was initiated by the filing of a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (doc. no. 1) on April 25, 2007 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.

Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan filed a Report and Recommendation on August 14, 2008 (doc. no. 46), recommending that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Thomas (doc. no. 35) be denied and that the Motion to Dismiss filed by the Commonwealth Defendants Rozum, Visinsky, Sroka, and Burks (doc. no. 28) be granted as to Defendants Rozum, Sroka and Burks and denied as to Defendant Visinsky. Plaintiff was served with the Report and Recommendation and advised that he had until September 2, 2008 to file objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 8th day of September, 2008;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Thomas (doc. no. 35) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by the Commonwealth Defendants Rozum, Visinsky, Sroka, and Burks (doc. no. 28) is GRANTED as to Defendants Rozum, Sroka and Burks and DENIED as to Defendant Visinsky.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 46) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan dated August 14, 2008, is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is remanded back to Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for all further pretrial proceedings.


Summaries of

Curry v. Thomas

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 8, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-94J (W.D. Pa. Sep. 8, 2008)
Case details for

Curry v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:KENDALL CURRY, Plaintiff, v. DR. THOMAS; WARDEN GERALD ROZUM; JOSEPH…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 8, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-94J (W.D. Pa. Sep. 8, 2008)

Citing Cases

Wenzke v. Correctional Medical Services

However, health care administrators are not immune from liability; where the facts indicate personal…

Carter v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

However, health care administrators are not immune from liability; where the facts indicate personal…