From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Currier v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Sep 18, 2003
114 S.W.3d 754 (Tex. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. 01-03-00452-CR.

Order issued September 18, 2003.

Appeal from County Criminal Court at Law No. 14, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 1145319.

For Appellant: Lydia Clay-Jackson, 1110 North Loop 336 W., Suite 500, Conroe, TX 77301.

For Appellee: William J. Delmore, III, Chief Prosecutor, Appellate Division, 1201 Franklin, 6th Floor, Houston, TX 77002.

Charles A. Rosenthal, Jr., Dist. Atty. — Harris County, 1201 Franklin, Suite 600, Houston, TX 77002-1923.

Panel consists of Justices HEDGES, NUCHIA, and HIGLEY.


ORDER TO AMEND CERTIFICATION


A jury found appellant, Franklin Pierce Currier, guilty of Class A misdemeanor assault and assessed punishment at one year in jail, probated for two years, with a fine of $2000. The trial court's certification of appellant's right of appeal in this case reflects that appellant actually waived his right to appeal

On July 17, 2003, we notified the parties by written order that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended certification were filed no later than August 8, 2003, and made part of the appellate record no later than August 18, 2003. No amended certification was filed.

An appeal must be dismissed unless a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has been made part of the record under the Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex.R.App.P. 25.2(d).

Appellant's retained counsel filed a document that purported to satisfy our July 17, 2003 order. It was not signed by the trial court, however, and is therefore not an amended certification. According to the Rules of Appellate Procedure, "[t]he trial court shall enter a certification of the defendant's right of appeal in every case in which it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order." Tex.R.App.P. 25.2(a)(2). (Emphasis added.)

Since the issuance of our July 17, 2003 order, the reporter's record has been filed. We have searched the entire record for a waiver of the right to appeal and found none. In fact, at the conclusion of the motion for new trial hearing, the trial court stated, "I trust you'll file your — I thought he filed a notice of appeal, but I trust you'll file your notice of appeal," to which appellant's counsel replied, "Oh, most assuredly."

We conclude that the trial court's certification that appellant waived his right to appeal is defective. See Tex.R.App.P. 37.1. We order withdrawn our order of July 17, 2003.

In accordance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we direct the trial court to prepare and file an amended certification of appellant's right of appeal to be included in a supplemental clerk's record. The supplemental record with the trial court's amended certification is due on or before October 8, 2003.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Currier v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Sep 18, 2003
114 S.W.3d 754 (Tex. App. 2003)
Case details for

Currier v. State

Case Details

Full title:FRANKLIN PIERCE CURRIER, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston

Date published: Sep 18, 2003

Citations

114 S.W.3d 754 (Tex. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Harris v. State

Thus, that Court has concluded that a certification that the defendant has no right of appeal is "defective"…

Dears v. State

Rule 25.2(d).Harris v. State, 137 S.W.3d 829, 830-31 (Tex.App.-Waco 2004, no pet.); Hargesheimer v. State,…