From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Currier v. Silkey

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough
Dec 7, 1920
112 A. 240 (N.H. 1920)

Opinion

Decided December 7, 1920.

Holman Smith, for the plaintiff.

Nathaniel E. Martin, for the defendant.


THE case was transferred from the May term, 1920, of the superior court upon an agreed statement of facts by Marble, J. The facts being considered insufficiently stated to raise the questions of law argued, the order was

Case discharged.


Summaries of

Currier v. Silkey

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough
Dec 7, 1920
112 A. 240 (N.H. 1920)
Case details for

Currier v. Silkey

Case Details

Full title:HIRAM B. CURRIER v. FRED SILKEY

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough

Date published: Dec 7, 1920

Citations

112 A. 240 (N.H. 1920)
112 A. 240

Citing Cases

Pickle v. Trimmel

         It is a well established rule of law in Pennsylvania that in the absence of sidewalks it is not…

Peterson v. Meehan

" Cole v. Wilson, 127 Me. 316, 319, 143 A. 178, 179; Schmeiske v. Laubin, 109 Conn. 206, 208, 145 A. 890. A…