holding that the undue-burden analysis "focuses solely on the effects within the regulating state"
Summary of this case from Little Rock Family Planning Servs. v. RutledgeNo. 14–997.
06-28-2016
Mary CURRIER, State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of Health, et al., petitioners, v. JACKSON WOMEN'S HEALTH ORGANIZATION, et al.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
holding that the undue-burden analysis "focuses solely on the effects within the regulating state"
Summary of this case from Little Rock Family Planning Servs. v. Rutledgeholding that the undue-burden analysis "focuses solely on the effects within the regulating state"
Summary of this case from Little Rock Family Planning Servs. v. RutledgeFull title:Mary CURRIER, State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of…
Court:Supreme Court of the United States
Date published: Jun 28, 2016
Other federal courts have held that States may not outsource their duty to protect the constitutional rights…
Little Rock Family Planning Servs. v. RutledgeOther federal courts have held that States may not outsource their duty to protect the constitutional rights…