From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CURNUTT v. HOLK

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Three
Apr 26, 1962
203 Cal.App.2d 6 (Cal. Ct. App. 1962)

Opinion

Docket No. 25473.

April 26, 1962.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County sustaining a demurrer to a complaint without leave to amend. Percy C. Heckendorf, Judge. Appeal dismissed.

Paul S. Garstang for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Parker, Stanbury, Reese McGee and Daren T. Johnson for Defendant and Respondent.


Plaintiff has attempted to appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend. [1] That order is not appealable. ( Cole v. Rush, 40 Cal.2d 178 [ 252 P.2d 1].) [2] A notice of appeal from such a nonappealable order may be liberally construed as an appeal from the judgment if there is a judgment. ( Evola v. Wendt Construction Co., 158 Cal.App.2d 658 [ 323 P.2d 158]; Smith v. Smith, 126 Cal.App.2d 194 [ 272 P.2d 118]; Crane v. Livingston, 98 Cal.App.2d 699 [ 220 P.2d 744].) [3] The record here contains a document signed by the trial judge entitled "Order Sustaining Demurrer" which orders that "the above action be and the same is hereby dismissed." This document would constitute a judgment if entered in the judgment book, but the record shows no such entry. [4] "In no case is a judgment effectual for any purpose until entered." (Code Civ. Proc., § 664) Prior to entry there is no assurance that the trial judge may not reconsider his decision. ( Phillips v. Phillips, 41 Cal.2d 869, 874 [ 264 P.2d 926]; Adoption of Bird, 183 Cal.App.2d 140, 144 [ 6 Cal.Rptr. 675].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Shinn, P.J., and Ford, J., concurred.


Summaries of

CURNUTT v. HOLK

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Three
Apr 26, 1962
203 Cal.App.2d 6 (Cal. Ct. App. 1962)
Case details for

CURNUTT v. HOLK

Case Details

Full title:JAMES L. CURNUTT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HERBERT C. HOLK, Defendant…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Three

Date published: Apr 26, 1962

Citations

203 Cal.App.2d 6 (Cal. Ct. App. 1962)
21 Cal. Rptr. 224

Citing Cases

Zappas v. King Williams Press, Inc.

( Daar v. Yellow Cab Co., 67 Cal.2d 695, 699 [ 63 Cal.Rptr. 724, 433 P.2d 732]; Cole v. Rush, 40 Cal.2d 178 […

Weiss v. Marcus

Liberally construed, the notice of appeal in the instant case is an appeal from the order of dismissal, and…