Argued October 8, 1919
Decided October 24, 1919
Frank R. Savidge and Frederick M. Thompson for appellant.
Edward W. Hatch, Frank B. Church and Herman S. Hertwig for respondents.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, HOGAN, McLAUGHLIN and CRANE, JJ. Dissenting: POUND, J.
Full title:HAZLITT A. CUPPY, Appellant, v . ARTEMAS WARD et al., Respondents
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 24, 1919
uld be gained by enjoining the execution of the contract because the Interstate Commerce Commission has the…
Sinicropi v. Bennettew York, 198 Misc. 647, 650). Conversely, contract principles such as mitigation of damages have been held to…