From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cunningham v. Mark D. Guidubaldi & Assocs., LLC

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Mar 11, 2019
Civil Action No. 4:18-CV-118 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 11, 2019)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 4:18-CV-118

03-11-2019

CRAIG CUNNINGHAM v. MARK D. GUIDUBALDI & ASSOCIATES, LLC D/B/A PROTECTION LEGAL GROUP, ET AL.


(Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak) MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On January 11, 2019, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #33) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants Mark D. Guidubaldi & Associates, LLC d/b/a Protection Legal Group, Law Office of Sanford J. Feder, LLC, and Sanford J. Feder, Esq.'s "Motion to Dismiss and to Strike Plaintiff's 'Amended Complaint'" (Dkt. #30) be granted in part and denied part. Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants Mark D. Guidubaldi & Associates, LLC d/b/a Protection Legal Group, Law Office of Sanford J. Feder, LLC, and Sanford J. Feder, Esq.'s "Motion to Dismiss and to Strike Plaintiff's 'Amended Complaint'" (Dkt. #30) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Specifically, Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Sanford J. Feder, Esq. and Law Office of Sanford J. Feder, LLC are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of personal jurisdiction. Plaintiff's claims under section 227(c) of the TCPA and for invasion of privacy should DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff's section 227(b) claim against Defendant Mark D. Guidubaldi & Associates, LLC d/b/a Protection Legal Group remains.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 11th day of March, 2019.

/s/_________

AMOS L. MAZZANT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cunningham v. Mark D. Guidubaldi & Assocs., LLC

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Mar 11, 2019
Civil Action No. 4:18-CV-118 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 11, 2019)
Case details for

Cunningham v. Mark D. Guidubaldi & Assocs., LLC

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG CUNNINGHAM v. MARK D. GUIDUBALDI & ASSOCIATES, LLC D/B/A PROTECTION…

Court:United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 11, 2019

Citations

Civil Action No. 4:18-CV-118 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 11, 2019)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Life Protect 24/7, Inc.

Pertinent here, § 227(b)(1)(A)(iii) essentially bans robocalls to cell phones, with § 227(c)(5) and 47 CFR §…

Perrong v. Victory Phones LLC

Courts have declined to extend its holding when the phone number was not procured for the express purpose of…