From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cunningham v. California

U.S.
Feb 21, 2006
546 U.S. 1169 (2006)

Summary

In Cunningham, the defendant is challenging judge-made findings of aggravating factors based on conduct related to the charged offense that were used to enhance his sentence pursuant to California law.Cunningham v. California, No. 05-6551, 2005 WL 3785203, at 20 (U.S. Sept. 17, 2005) (petition for writ of certiorari).

Summary of this case from Robertson v. U.S.

Opinion

No. 05-6551.

February 21, 2006.


Certiorari Granted.

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted.


Summaries of

Cunningham v. California

U.S.
Feb 21, 2006
546 U.S. 1169 (2006)

In Cunningham, the defendant is challenging judge-made findings of aggravating factors based on conduct related to the charged offense that were used to enhance his sentence pursuant to California law.Cunningham v. California, No. 05-6551, 2005 WL 3785203, at 20 (U.S. Sept. 17, 2005) (petition for writ of certiorari).

Summary of this case from Robertson v. U.S.
Case details for

Cunningham v. California

Case Details

Full title:CUNNINGHAM v. CALIFORNIA

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 21, 2006

Citations

546 U.S. 1169 (2006)
126 S. Ct. 1329

Citing Cases

Robertson v. U.S.

On March 13, 2006, petitioner filed this motion to hold his case in abeyance. He now argues that the Supreme…

People v. Waymire

( People v. Cunningham (Apr. 18, 2005, No. A103501) [nonpub. opn.], cert. granted sub nom. Cunningham v.…