From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cummins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 4, 1988
519 So. 2d 718 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-770.

February 4, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County; Emerson R. Thompson, Jr., Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Kenneth Witts, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Kevin Kitpatrick Carson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


Ronald Cummins was placed on three years' probation in October, 1985, for the offense of dealing in stolen property. In November, 1986, Cummins was arrested for grand theft. Cummins pled guilty to the grand theft charge and admitted the probation violation. The trial court, relying on Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(14), increased the sentence in each case to the next higher cell without written reasons for departure. This was error. The automatic one-cell departure of Rule 3.701(d)(14) only applies to the sentence imposed for the earlier offense for which probation was revoked (dealing in stolen property), not for the subsequent offense (grand theft) which constitutes the probation violation.

Circuit Court Case No. 85-5160.

Circuit Court Case No. 86-7793.

Accordingly, we reverse the sentence imposed in Case No. 86-7793, and remand for resentencing within the recommended guidelines range of twelve to thirty months, unless valid reasons for departure are set forth in writing.

SENTENCE REVERSED; REMANDED.

SHARP, C.J., and COWART, J. concur.


Summaries of

Cummins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 4, 1988
519 So. 2d 718 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Cummins v. State

Case Details

Full title:RONALD R. CUMMINS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 4, 1988

Citations

519 So. 2d 718 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Peters v. State

KOGAN, Justice. We have for review a decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in Peters v. State, 516…

Stokes v. State

Appellant asserts that the lower court erred in increasing the sentence to the next higher cell, arguing that…