In Cumming v. Brooklyn City R.R. Co. (104 N.Y. 669), tried before Mr. Justice CULLEN, the ordinance was offered by the plaintiff and received over objection and exception.
Summary of this case from Meyers v. BarrettArgued January 20, 1887
Decided February 8, 1887
Nathaniel C. Moak for appellant.
B.F. Tracy for respondent.
PECKHAM, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
In Cumming v. Brooklyn City R.R. Co. (104 N.Y. 669), tried before Mr. Justice CULLEN, the ordinance was offered by the plaintiff and received over objection and exception.
Summary of this case from Meyers v. BarrettFull title:BESSIE J. CUMMING, by Guardian, etc., Respondent, v . THE BROOKLYN CITY…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 8, 1887
So it was held, even in the case of steam-cars, where plaintiff attempted to cross a street…
Windover v. Troy City R. Co.The jury should not be permitted to make a rule of law to suit themselves, or find a fact without evidence. (…