From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cullen v. Green

Superior Court of Delaware
Jan 1, 1848
5 Del. 17 (Del. Super. Ct. 1848)

Opinion

Spring Sessions, 1848.

Bayard, for plaintiff.

Layton, for defendant.


THIS was an action of assumpsit, for compensation to an attorney, in certain suits and causes conducted by him for the defendant.

The defendant pleaded a tender, and Mr. Bayard now moved to strike out the plea, because the money was not deposited; which the court ordered. But they said the defendant might deposit the money under Art. 6, Sec. 17, of the Constitution, though it would not avail under a plea of tender, which must aver that the defendant is and has always been ready,c.


Summaries of

Cullen v. Green

Superior Court of Delaware
Jan 1, 1848
5 Del. 17 (Del. Super. Ct. 1848)
Case details for

Cullen v. Green

Case Details

Full title:ELISHA D. CULLEN vs. ELIZA GREEN

Court:Superior Court of Delaware

Date published: Jan 1, 1848

Citations

5 Del. 17 (Del. Super. Ct. 1848)

Citing Cases

Irvine v. Hawkins

III. The established rule now is, as it has been, to pay the money into court when a plea of tender is made…