From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Culbertson Appeal

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Dec 28, 1956
182 Pa. Super. 374 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1956)

Opinion

November 13, 1956.

December 28, 1956.

Roads — Vacation of portion of public road — Reports of viewers and reviewers — Discretion of lower court — Scope of appellate review.

1. On appeal from a decree of the lower court vacating a portion of a public road, the appellate review is on certiorari upon which the record only is brought before the appellate court; and the appellate court does not have the power to go into the merits of the case or to review questions of fact raised by the evidence.

2. The lower court is vested with discretion to approve or disapprove the reports of viewers and reviewers.

Before RHODES, P.J., HIRT, GUNTHER, WRIGHT, WOODSIDE, ERVIN, and CARR, JJ.

Appeal, No. 223, April T., 1956, from decree of Court of Quarter Sessions of Armstrong County, Dec. T., 1954, No. 7, in re petition of the Supervisors of Mahoning Township, Armstrong County, Pennsylvania, to vacate a portion of Township Road No. 601. Decree affirmed.

Proceeding upon exceptions of township supervisors to decision of board of viewers recommending that road should not be vacated.

Order entered vacating road, opinion by GRAFF, P.J. Property owner appealed.

Harry A. Heilman, Jr., for appellant.

W. Davis Graham, for appellee.


Argued November 13, 1956.


This is an appeal from a decree of the lower court vacating a portion of a public road after a finding by the court that it was useless, inconvenient, burdensome and unnecessary. The argument before us concerned solely the sufficiency of the evidence.

By a long and unbroken line of decisions the appellate and lower courts of Pennsylvania have consistently held that our review is on certiorari upon which the record only is brought before us. We do not have the power to go into the merits of the case or to review questions of fact raised by the evidence. Likar Appeal, 157 Pa. Super. 572, 575, 43 A.2d 388; Middlecreek Township Road Case, 162 Pa. Super. 619, 620, 60 A.2d 438. The lower court is vested with discretion to approve or disapprove the reports of viewers and reviewers. In Re Public Road in Benzinger Township, 115 Pa. 436, 10 A. 35; Benton Township Road, 41 Pa. Super. 57.

Even if we were to consider this matter on a broad certiorari, we would be obliged to come to the same conclusion and affirm the decree of the lower court. The 1500 foot portion of the road to be abandoned constituted a loop through the Culbertson property. This portion of the roadway was mainly used for the purpose of aiding the farming operations upon the Culbertson property. While it will be necessary for the Culbertsons to travel a longer distance to reach the township roadway system beyond their farm land, this inconvenience is greatly overbalanced by the cost that would be entailed in reconstruction and upkeep.

Decree affirmed.


Summaries of

Culbertson Appeal

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Dec 28, 1956
182 Pa. Super. 374 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1956)
Case details for

Culbertson Appeal

Case Details

Full title:Culbertson Appeal

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 28, 1956

Citations

182 Pa. Super. 374 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1956)
128 A.2d 95

Citing Cases

In re Paper Mill Rd.

"In reviewing the report of a board of viewers, a trial court may confirm it or reject it and direct a…

Zeni v. Township Supervisors

Although neither counsel addressed the issue of this court's scope of review when a common pleas court adopts…