From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Mayor of Baltimore City

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 25, 1992
979 F.2d 356 (4th Cir. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-3506.

Argued October 29, 1991.

Decided November 25, 1992.

Richard K. Jacobsen, Sr. Sol., Baltimore, Md., argued (Neal M. Janey, City Sol., Ambrose T. Hartman, Deputy City Sol., on brief), for defendant-appellant.

Jack Lawrence Benoit Gohn, Whiteford, Taylor Preston, Baltimore, Md., argued (H. Russell Smouse, Thomas L. Samuel, Baltimore, Md., Richard C. Keene, Sr. Counsel, Law Dept., CSX Rail Transport, Jacksonville, Fla., on brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-90-690-JFM).

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.


OPINION


We have considered the briefs and record in this case, as well as the oral argument of the attorneys, and are of opinion that we should affirm the judgment of the district court on its opinion.

We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court on its opinion, 759 F. Supp. 281 (D.Md. 1991).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Mayor of Baltimore City

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 25, 1992
979 F.2d 356 (4th Cir. 1992)
Case details for

CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Mayor of Baltimore City

Case Details

Full title:CSX TRANSPORTATION, INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. MAYOR AND CITY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 25, 1992

Citations

979 F.2d 356 (4th Cir. 1992)

Citing Cases

Union Pac. R.R. Co. v. Danner

(revisions in original) (quoting CSX Transp., Inc. v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore City, Md.…

Iowa, Chicago Eastern v. Washington

Thus, while § 130 did not expressly address the question of federal preemption, as the FRSA did, we see a…