From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cruz v. State Farm Lloyds

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
Aug 9, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-CV-203 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 9, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-CV-203

08-09-2018

ESTEBAN CRUZ, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM LLOYDS, Defendant.


ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant's Motion for Partial Dismissal (D.E. 2). On August 8, 2018, Plaintiff timely filed an amended complaint (D.E. 9), which does not reference the earlier complaint (D.E. 1-1, pp. 2-13). "An amended complaint supersedes the original complaint and renders it of no legal effect unless the amended complaint specifically refers to and adopts or incorporates by reference the earlier pleading." King v. Dogan, 31 F.3d 344, 346 (5th Cir. 1994) (citing Boelens v. Redman Homes, Inc., 759 F.2d 504, 508 (5th Cir.1985)). A Rule 12(b)(6) motion addressed to a superseded complaint is moot. See generally, Van Deelen v. Cain, 628 F. App'x 891, 900 (5th Cir. 2015) (noting that prior motions to dismiss had been mooted by prior amended complaints). See also, Maxim Integrated Prod., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., No. SA-14-CV-1030-XR, 2015 WL 10990119, at *1 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 12, 2015) (citing Merritt v. Fogel, 349 F. App'x 742, 745 (3d Cir. 2009)). Consequently, the Court TERMINATES AS MOOT Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (D.E. 2).

ORDERED this 9th day of August, 2018.

/s/_________

NELVA GONZALES RAMOS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cruz v. State Farm Lloyds

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
Aug 9, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-CV-203 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 9, 2018)
Case details for

Cruz v. State Farm Lloyds

Case Details

Full title:ESTEBAN CRUZ, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM LLOYDS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

Date published: Aug 9, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-CV-203 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 9, 2018)