Opinion
October 20, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Belen, J.),
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by adding thereto a provision directing the defendant to post a surety bond as a condition of vacating the damage award; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a determination of the amount of the bond.
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the defendant's motion to vacate the default judgment to the limited extent of setting aside the damage award and directing a new inquest at which the defendant may litigate the issue of damages ( see, Interboro Mgt. Co. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 139 A.D.2d 697; Midnight Ears v. Clear-Vu Packaging, 81 A.D.2d 907). However, we further find that the court should have granted the plaintiff's request that the defendant be required to post a surety bond as a condition of vacating the damage award ( see, Glick Supply Co. v. Satterwhite, 215 A.D.2d 179; Rubin v. Payne, 103 A.D.2d 946). We remit this issue to the Supreme Court to fix the amount of the bond.
The defendant's arguments attacking the propriety of the underlying default judgment are not properly presented for our review in the absence of a cross appeal ( see, Hecht v. City of New York, 60 N.Y.2d 57).
Miller, J.P., Ritter, Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.