From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crummer Co. v. Dupont

U.S.
Oct 10, 1955
350 U.S. 848 (1955)

Opinion

No. 300.

October 10, 1955, OCTOBER TERM, 1955.


C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this application. Francis P. Whitehair, Warren Hall and Chris Dixie for petitioners. Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and Ralph M. McLane, Assistant Attorney General, for Clements et al., Clarence G. Ashby for DuPont et al., Donald Russell for Ball et al., Charles R. Scott for the St. Joe Paper Co., William H. Rogers for Pierce et al., Asbury Summerline for Gall, John W. Donahoo and Chester Bedell for the Cummer Sons Cypress Co. and H. M. Voorhis and W. H. Poe for Leedy, Wheeler Alleman, Inc. et. al., respondents. Reported Below: 223 F.2d 238.


Summaries of

Crummer Co. v. Dupont

U.S.
Oct 10, 1955
350 U.S. 848 (1955)
Case details for

Crummer Co. v. Dupont

Case Details

Full title:CRUMMER COMPANY et al. v. DUPONT et al

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 10, 1955

Citations

350 U.S. 848 (1955)

Citing Cases

FORT SILL APACHE TRIBE OF ST., OKL. v. U.S.

* * * it should be possible to construe the statute liberally to affect its remedial purpose and intent, and…

Western Shoshone Identifiable Group v. U.S.

The contingent nature of this claim and the results obtained are entitled to more weight than has been given…