From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crowther v. Micucci

Court of Chancery and Prerogative Court
Jan 26, 1938
196 A. 676 (N.J. 1938)

Opinion

Argued October term, 1937.

Decided January 26th, 1938.

On appeal from the court of chancery, whose opinion is reported in 122 N.J. Eq. 81.

Messrs. Pesin Pesin ( Mr. Meyer Pesin), for the defendant-appellant.

Mr. William George and Mr. Leo Blumberg, for the complainant-appellee.


The proofs, carefully examined, abundantly support the findings of the learned vice-chancellor from whose decree the present appeal is taken, and we agree with his finding on the rule of law as to the burden of proof.

The decree will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Crowther v. Micucci

Court of Chancery and Prerogative Court
Jan 26, 1938
196 A. 676 (N.J. 1938)
Case details for

Crowther v. Micucci

Case Details

Full title:FRANCES CROWTHER, complainant-appellee, v. NICHOLAS MICUCCI…

Court:Court of Chancery and Prerogative Court

Date published: Jan 26, 1938

Citations

196 A. 676 (N.J. 1938)
196 A. 676

Citing Cases

Hackensack Trust Co. v. Nowacki

There is no doubt in my mind that the relationship that existed between Nowacki and the decedent was one of…

Brettenheimer v. Brettenheimer

Even if the execution by complainant of the deed here in question was not the result of undue influence…